🔗 Share this article

Ex-President Donald Trump has repeatedly expressed his wish to see critics probed, applying influence on the DOJ to prosecute ex FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

"We cannot postpone further, it's damaging our reputation and trustworthiness," the leader stated last month in a social media message.

"I was impeached twice, and indicted me (five times!)" he said, mentioning the four criminal cases he encountered after departing the White House in 2021 and James's civil case.

Both have subsequently been indicted, in situations that numerous experts have stated appear to be driven by politics and challenging to win in legal proceedings.

But the latest allegations against a presidential opponent, ex national security adviser John Bolton, stand apart, legal specialists and ex-prosecutors assert.

"In my opinion, contrasting Bolton's case to James' is like comparing apples to oranges," said Mark Lesko, a former federal prosecutor for the Eastern District of New York.

This Specifics of the Case

Bolton has been formally charged on national allegations pertaining to the alleged mishandling of classified information. After departing the White House in 2019, he has become a vocal Trump critic, even to describe him "remarkably ignorant" and unfit for the presidency in his memoir.

Specialists say that while there may be political motivations to go after Bolton, the procedures used to secure an indictment and the proof gathered against him suggest a possibly more substantial legal argument than the DOJ presented against James.

"These actions that's being claimed is both more severe and appears to have taken place over a significant period of time," commented Carissa Byrne Hessick, a academic at the University of North Carolina School of Law.

During his time as Trump's national security adviser, and after his 2019 White House departure, authorities alleged that Bolton placed the nation at danger by improperly retaining and transmitting classified information to relatives using insecure means, including AOL. Several of the documents were labeled highly classified.

The indictment alleges that at one point a hacker gained access to Bolton's system where files were stored and sent an apparent threat to cause "the largest controversy since Hillary [Clinton]'s emails were leaked".

Bolton pleaded not guilty during a court appearance on recently to eighteen separate charges of improperly handling classified information.

Political Motivation or a Substantial Case?

The timing of his charge - arriving on the heels of allegations against Comey - has revived concerns about external influence on the legal system.

Trump once suggested Bolton belonged in jail, and described him a "sleazebag". Bolton, for his role, wrote a book about his experience in the Trump administration that was highly critical of the president.

"Undoubtedly that the timing of this indictment, when combined with additional cases, has prompted doubts about the validity of these allegations, and why these charges are being brought now," stated Jamil Jaffer, creator and executive director of the National Security Institute.

However, he continued, "should the Justice Department is able to demonstrate the facts alleged and demonstrate the information is correctly classified, his conduct may very well have broken the statute".

Charging such a senior figure for mishandling classified documents is "rare" but not without precedent, noted Carrie Cordero, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security.

"Situations that concern classified information pose difficulties to prosecute, but they can and are filed against equally low-level and senior officials, from time to time," she said.

Parallels to Examinations into Trump and Biden

Trump likewise encountered charges of wrongfully keeping classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida and obstructing their return, but that matter was ultimately thrown out by a federal judge and negated by his return as president.

A special counsel also determined that former President Joe Biden improperly stored classified documents from his period as second-in-command, but did not prosecute him.

Bolton's situation shares characteristics to Trump's sensitive materials matters, noted Mr Lesko, who also held a top national security role at the Justice Department.

Rigorous protocols regulate the management of sensitive materials. To win a conviction, the government must prove that Bolton was aware the material he was sending was classified, and he had to intentionally transmit it to someone not entitled to receive it.

"Due to the sensitive nature of the information at issue in this case, we lack a lot of particulars about the reasons the prosecution contends elements like the personal notes and the other information he shared by email, and the reason there were restricted," explained Mr Jaffer.

A Increasingly Conventional Prosecution

The procedure by which the DOJ initiated this legal action will be closely examined, following Trump openly expressed his wish to see his political opponents prosecuted and some of those charges came to fruition.

But Mr Lesko said in Bolton's case, prosecutors seem to have followed protocol.

"This Bolton case and eventually the indictment appeared to have followed the regular process including the regulations and norms within the Department of Justice," he stated.

Unlike Comey's short, two-page indictment, Bolton's was a increasingly "conventional" filing that "clearly outlines the details concerning the circumstances and situation in this instance," Mr Lesko said.

"It appears fairly consistent with a long line of precedents... where government officials mishandled and shared sensitive information."